Contribute  :  Calendar  :  Advanced Search  :  Site Statistics  :  Directory  
911Courage    911Courage    911Courage
 Welcome to 911Courage
 Tuesday, September 07 2010 @ 08:41 PM EDT  -   Please don't forget to check 'Events' at left.

Pentagon 10/13/06

 Email Article To a Friend View Printable Version 
Leafletting in Washington, DC Today, Friday the 13th, Erin Myers and I went to the Pentagon. Leafletting is illegal there, so we brought signs. Erin held a 6plus feet long patriotsquestion911.com. He held it over his head on a couple poles for 2 plus hours. I held "More Gin, Less Rummy". We started a little before 7AM and ended about 9 AM. It was a sublime experience.

We stood near where I had stood a couple of years ago with the Dorothy Day Catholic Worker vigil. It's an interesting spot. A certain significant minority of passersby have no connection to the Pentagon. They either switch from subway to bus or vice versa at the US war HQ.

For 50 minutes we stood outside the cordoned off zone for vigilers. They had parade style moveable metal fences. I thought they had decided not to allow vigilers and was waiting to be shooed away. It turned out they were not so draconian, they just needed to reinforce their right to establish protest zones. It's not nearly as unreasonable as when the president ventures out. He's not allowed to see any signs. Everybody could see ours.

There were dozens of positive responses to my joke at the secretary's expense. Sometimes you'd hear people laugh loudly. Sometimes just the thumbs up sign. Sometimes a big smile. Sometimes just a glimmer. Erin and I agreed that Mr. Rumsfeld could easily be able to be amused rather than threatened by the joke. A couple of years ago when I first had the idea, I met a fellow who claimed acquaintance of Rummy in his Illinois days. He, at least, felt that Rummy would be amused. You can't tell me a man of those long years has never had to bear the brunt of a surname so close to the great temptation, "demon rum."

I must compare this feat of dozens of smiling peole to my many years of guerilla theater activities. I chose the standard of getting the police to smile as the highest honor for street theater. Pentagon workers are not actually police, but as the old saying goes, "it's close enough for government work."

The main reason we were there was Erin's sign. Three people came over separately to speak to us.

One fellow wanted us to speculate. He asked why anyone in the government would want to commit such an act. I said it was possible they wanted an excuse to invade Iraq. He asked why. I said it's possible they wanted the oil. Then I urged him to look at the site. I said he didn't even know my background to know whether listening to my speculation was worth his time, I reminded him that the 51 former government officials listed at the site had significant credentials, some even from DOD. He seemed to accept that.

Another fellow asked for clarification, and then claimed that issue wasn't his responsibility. I noted that as a citizen he should have great cause for concern if the official story was a lie. He seemed to see my point.

Then there was the colonel who had written 2 books. He was polite enough, but saddened me greatly. His main point was that since the 51 former government officials was such a tiny percentage of retired government workers, it's hardly impressive enough to examine. He said he's seen other 911 websites and thus need not look at this one.

He reminded me of a feeling I sometimes have that some of my closest relatives, who deserve praise for being as good to me as they are, don't seem to see any difference between a terrorist and a nonviolent activist. Almost like lumping Gandhi and Bin laden together. Maybe I'm being unfair to my relatives, but I was not unfair when I suggested this historian colonel was afraid to look at the evidence. He denied it, of course. Nevertheless, any so called, "debunker" should be encouraged to make actual critiques of what we assert, rather than calling us names. It's better to make it easier for those sophisticated at obfuscation to deal with the evidence we present.

Ultimately our scholar colonel was easily polite enough and deserving of praise on that front. He involved himself in sophistry over the Minetta testimony, but he was nowhere near mean spirited.

Ultimately, his biggest weakness was that he spent 15 minutes with 2 people who have no claim to professional authority on the issue so he could justify ignoring the assertions of some who can claim to have professional authority.

He did raise a discussion of Pierre Salinger's involvement in the analysis of the mystery of flight 800. His point was that Salinger was outside his "pay grade"( my words) , suggesting that Salinger's misplaced involvement should give other nonprofessionals pause.

Here's a respectful challenge to any debunker. Go through the patriots listed at patriotsquestion911.com and make your case that each of them should not be heeded.

The lone guard carrying an automatic weapon came over a little before 9. He asked if we were staying all day. I said no, we'd leave soon. He noted concern for our safety if he left. Erin exclaimed how little tension seemed to surround our effort. The guard reiterated how committed he was to free speech. I responded that one of the implications of a position like mine that 911 was an inside job is that they could do it again, declare martial law and round up people like me and put us in camps, which are already built. These camps exist ostensibly for illegal immigrants, but could still be used to hold activists born in this country, like me.

I realize I want very much to go back and raise the following question:

Since the rubble pile from the towers was so small, what sort of weapon could have caused whatever wasn't in the rubble to be transformed into dust sized particles. These tiny particles have wreaked havoc with the lungs of so many first responders, not to mention everyday residents of Lower Manhattan. How can all the concrete on every floor become dust?

Dave Slesinger
Rockville, Maryland

 
Post a comment
Comments (4) Trackbacks (0)

10/03/06 at the Department of State

 Email Article To a Friend View Printable Version 
Leafletting in Washington, DCToday, October 3, my mother's 85th birthday, Erin Myers and I went down to the State Department and gave out around 300 leaflets. I made 200 originally, had 20 left over, and went to Kinkos at GWU to make 80 more. I believe it's possible to give out 500 plus at the locations we did.

I used the greeting, "State department workers preserve the nations honor."

One man said, "That's what I'm trying to do." As he declined to accept the leaflet.

One woman made disapproving faces, but did not cross into incivility.

I went to get more leaflets. I'm glad I did. In the second batch was my favorite.
A man responded to my laudatory comments on preserving the nation's honor. He said,"It's too late!" I said, "No, No! That's what this is about." He took the leaflet. He could be the jackpot right there!

THE PEOPLE ON THE EDGE OF POWER ARE EVERYDAY WORKING PEOPLE LIKE YOU. REACH OUT TO THEM ABOUT 9/11.

Another man asked me to tell him why he should take the leaflet. I said, "There are over 50 former government officials saying we should have a real investigation of 9/11. Some of them even say it's an inside job." He took the leaflet. I asked one and only one woman if she'd heard of Ed Peck. She had.

One idea is to go to each of the federal agencies that have anyone previously at that agency to quote.

I discussed race in the DOJ/FBI post. I'll attempt to do it again here.

I don't think it's reasonable to talk of dealing with good sized numbers of humans in the DC area without some respect paid to race. Cornel West emphasizes the depth of the problem. Any white person needs to think twice or more before they claim to fully aware of racism.

There were more black faces than white ones coming from State. It surprised me. It could be there are a lot of automobile commuters I was missing. The willingness to take a leaflet seemed not to be correlated with race. Most people took leaflets. It was a little better response than DOJ.

People need to consider doing this at home. You know how video presentations of dangerous feats include a warning: Don't do this at home. I'm offering a different warning: IF you DON'T do this at home NOW, we'll have fascism with police arbitrarily brutalizing innocent people.

Next Up (or soon at least): the NTSB and/or the FAA

Dave Slesinger
Rockville, Maryland
 
Post a comment
Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

Leafletting for Whistleblowers 9/21/06

 Email Article To a Friend View Printable Version 
Leafletting in Washington, DCFBI POLICEMAN SHOUTED, "We don't want you here. Nobody is interested in what you have to say." I corrected him saying a couple of people had taken the leaflet. I agreed most people weren't interested. I complemented him by saying he was being very effective standing in front of me since it was harder to leaflet. Then I gave out 3 leaflets really quick to workers exiting.

The 3 personal accounts below kick off our campaign to leaflet federal whistleblowers. We urge people to repeat our efforts who are capable of distinguishing between the patriots who implement federal policy and those who committed treason on 911. Like our civil disobedience, this is a moral challenge, not a physical challenge. While leafleting has physical dimensions, that's not the level we challenge them on.

If you have any interest please contact David Slesinger at 240-221-3293 or dslesinger@alum.mit.edu or you may always sign up for an account and leave your comments, request or your own story below. Our current leaflet is below the personal accounts of the event.


After having leafleted deception dollars at the DOJ on a lark a few months ago, I thought there were four entrances for the four sides. First I went to the north door. It was too slow. I walked back toward Dan, on the west. I asked the people waiting for the bus near the north door if any of them worked for DOJ. There was only one. He took the leaflet. It seems people exited mainly east and west.

I walked around to check on Erin, who was fine. I walked back to Dan and decided to go to Staples to get more leaflets. As I walked north a DOJ official of East Asian ancestry was being interviewed for TV. I offered a leaflet and he took it.

When I got to Staples, I made a correction by eliminating the word surprise from the first leaflet. I made 200.

I had picked DOJ as our first focus because I thought the newer FBI building had no place to enter and exit except by car. On the way back to DOJ from Staples, I saw people exiting "the Bureau". What other bureau could be 'the" bureau? I started to leaflet and was immediately told I couldn't leaflet there because it was federal property. He suggested I leaflet across the street. I called my lawyer friend and left messages on both work and cell.

I went back to DOJ, in the next block, and spoke with Dan. I gave him more leaflets and walked around the building on the south side to find Erin walking back after having given out all of his. He was upbeat.

I walked back to the west side. Dan said they watched me carefully as I had walked toward Erin. I went over to the guards to introduce myself. They declined to shake my hand. I offered the DVD of my talk on nonviolence at the 911:Revealing the Truth Conference in Chicago in June. They said to just leave the DVD a few feet away from them. A fellow who had taken Dan's leaflet and was nearby explained that the guards couldn't accept anything. I said I wanted to have it get to their bosses. I explained my lawyer had advised me what I was doing was legal, but that the authorities would want to check me out. I wanted them to know I'm open to dialogue. The fellow who had taken the leaflet from Dan volunteered to give it to the right people. He was a dressed down barrel- chested guy who probably was undercover.

Because half the people exiting west were cutting across the street before getting to Dan, I stood where they would have to walk. My pitch was," Department of Justice workers are the bulwark of freedom." Half the people took them. It was the opposite of normal leafleting. Black folks didn't take them as much as white folks.

The fear federal workers would have of offending bosses is hardly irrelevant. This is why I didn't want media attention. If we took a picture while leafleting, it could be right when our best shot at a whistleblower was passing by.

My lawyer friend called from his cell and reiterated I could leaflet outside the Bureau. He agreed to take a call, if necessary.

I went north to the FBI and began leafletting those exiting the southwestern corner. The western exit I had stopped at earlier was not far from this one, but the corner exit was marked "Employees Only". It was about 5:30PM.

My pitch was," I'll bet you care about the Constitution even more than I do." One guy responded, "I carry it in my pocket." Only a couple people took leaflets. That was partly because there were knee high metal obstacles that workers exiting the building had to walk through. This is bad for leafleting since as soon as people left the building they spread out and didn't walk close enough to me. This might be remedied by having several leafleters spread in a semicircle at once.

One black officer immediately urged me to stop. I explained my lawyer had told me it was okay. I said that if they needed to arrest me, I promised to be completely polite. He insisted I should have my lawyer come here to talk to him. He said he wasn't going to arrest me. As I started leafleting again, he complained I wasn't listening to him. I responded that I was listening I just didn't agree.

Then higher ranking white guards came out. One blond guy said he'd distribute my leaflets inside for me. I said I wasn't sure he was sincere. He was the "good cop". The other dark haired guard asked why I was there. I handed him a leaflet, which he declined. He wanted me to explain. I said I was very worried about the country. I said that I respected the people who worked there. In particular I thought 9/11 was an inside job. He began yelling at me and standing increasingly close to me so I had to keep moving back. He yelled," We don't want you here. Nobody is interested in what you have to say." I corrected him saying a couple of people had taken the leaflet. I agreed most people weren't interested. I complemented him by saying he was being very effective standing in front of me since it was harder to leaflet. Then I gave out 3 leaflets really quick to workers exiting. Is it possible that my confrontation with the FBI guards made my leaflet more interesting?

The "good cop" asked for my license. I made sure he agreed to give it back. An important aspect of nonviolence is to not be afraid of what the police might know. He returned with it and said I was clean. I said I'd be willing to come talk to them if they were interested. They offered to give me a number to call. I said I didn't want to come down, but I would if they wanted me to. All I require is that we be able to tape any conversation. I said I'd given a DVD of my talk in Chicago to people at DOJ, and didn't have another. They were interested that we had people at DOJ and asked where. I told them.

The "bad cop" claimed that they don't want people standing at the FBI exit since even if I wasn't taking note of faces, others could do so after I set the precedent. I said there was some merit to that argument. They noted my bag, which he said was a source of fear. I said I had hundreds of American flags in it, that they were welcome to examine. They did. The "bad cop" kept saying I was harassing the workers. Considering how polite I was and how determined he was to intimidate me, I noted the irony to myself.

Dan called and said he was ready to eat. The "good cop" made a pitch that I give him all the leaflets in my hand. I had to admit it was a reasonable request. I gave him about 40. Dan arrived. I told the cops that none of them had crossed any reasonableness line. We left for the Hawk and Dove Pub.

Commentary:

Can you imagine the impact of the release of ONE of the 12 documents?

This can be done at all federal buildings in the US. If you do it, send us your story. If you can't be completely polite NO MATTER WHAT, don't do it.

We need people to come to DC and leaflet the bureau again. Contact 911courage.org or me at 240-221-3293 or at dslesinger@alum.mit.edu.

I'd like to leaflet State, the FAA, Commerce (NIST) and the White House. I'd consider doing the CIA and Pentagon and NSA, but it IS illegal to leaflet there.

Dave Slesinger
Rockville, Maryland
September 22, 2006

 
Post a comment
Comments (3) Trackbacks (0)

Three Women at the Department of Justice

 Email Article To a Friend View Printable Version 
Leafletting in Washington, DCYesterday, Dave Slesinger, myself and a fellow named Erin Myers leafletted 911Courage's "CALL FOR FEDERAL CIVIL SERVANTS TO SAVE THE CONSTITUTION" flyer at the Department of Justice in Washington, DC. It's a call for federal level whistleblowers with Daniel Ellsberg's September 2004 plea for the exposure of any of a list of 12 important documents that have not been made available to the public in full, completely withheld or censored beyond meaningfulness.

 
read more (945 words) Post a comment
Comments (1) Trackbacks (0)

The Heart of America Still Beats

 Email Article To a Friend View Printable Version 
Leafletting in Washington, DC

My name is Erin S. Myers. I'm nobody of any particular note save for what I fancy as a somewhat unpopular mindset in a climate of popular fear. A climate of fire, which I view as intentionally stoked more than rationality and reason should call for; For I do not fear this government, rather I suspect, this government fears me.... the way it should be.

 
read more (427 words) Post a comment
Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
 Copyright © 2006 David Slesinger,  dslesinger@alum.mit.edu
 All comments, trademarks and copyrights on
 this page are owned by their respective owners.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Powered By Geeklog 
Created this page in 0.15 seconds 
Webmaster Contact