|Dear Dave Slesinger:|
I read the Alexander Baldinger article (and watched the video of your interview) at the newspapers web site. First of all, you deserve a lot of credit for leafleting at the threatre (something I have yet to do) and risking arrest and then getting arrested for trespass (apparently the second time you leafleted). I posted a comment to Mr. Baldinger's article (Link at 'read more' below. Ed.) and the other comments at the web site which I thought you'd like to see.
I am active in the 9/11 Truth movement here in Arizona, Phoenix area. I attended the Chicago 9/11 Truth Conference with Kent Knudson.
Great to hear from you. You are very eloquent. The contrast between OS Forgotten, the 2 hr standown, and the sensitive airspace should alert anyone with curiosity, should include journalists. I'm sure journalists are more curious than most.
Hope you'll have a chance to review my 90 minute presentation in Chicago on Gandhian nonviolence. I assert that a large majority of American nonviolence practitioners eschew Gandhi's wisdom about resistance. I quote my mentor Arthur Harvey,"the power of nonviolence has something to with actually making a personal sacrifice." I would add" to show my depth of concern".
The moral force which is shown consciously through nonviolence definitely has the potential to prevent the next false flag operation, with its concomitant martial law and camps for the regime's adversaries. If every city of 50,000 had some one serving time to bring this issue to light, they wouldn't dare risk it. Cities of 100,000 as the minimum? Probably. 250,000?, maybe, 500,000? possibly. 100,000? somewhat possible.
Public education isn't enough. Here's proof: when I leafletted the WTC movie legally last Saturday the most common response was "I know all about it." These good people are obviously not worried about martial law. This is our challenge.
I'd love to hear from you by phone. 240-221-3293(h) 410-499-5403(c)
Frederick News-Post Online
08/23/06 @ 7:23 AM by: aquapete
Alexander Baldinger is to be praised for his overall objective story of 9/11 Truth Seeker David Schlesinger who leafleted outside the Regal movie theatre at the showing of "World Trade Center." I would invite Mr. Baldiner to do some of his own research to confirm or deny some of the allegations voiced by David Schlesinger about what happened on 9/11/2001.
To those critics of Mr. Schlesinger's contentions about the government's role and possible complicity in 9/11/2001, I would suggest that personal attacks on Mr.Schlesinger (i.e. is weight or girth) or simple contentions that "the federal government wasn't involved in 9/11) do not address the real substance of the issue. Simply saying or wishing something is not so, doesn't make it not so. We need hard evidence or proof. So far, the government has presented scant or no evidence to provide any conclusive proof that these 19 named Muslims were involved in 9/11. In fact seven or nine of them have come forward and said they are still alive and why are they on the FBI list of "hijackers"? The FBI has not taken the time or trouble to revise their list or address the issue of whether these 19 names Muslims were ever involved in 9/11. And what about Osama Bin Forgotten. Are we to believe that 19 named Muslims with box cutters directed by "Osama Bin Forgotten" got the U.S. Air Force to stand down for almost two hours while four planes flew over highly secure and sensitive air space for this period, unchallenged?
And how did the "hijackers" succeed in violating the laws of physics by getting three buildings (one of which wasn't even hit by a plane--Bldg. #7) to come down at free fall speed (8-10 seconds)? The "pancake theory" of collapse would not explain the way these three buildings have come down in controlled demolition fashion. No other steel reinforced concrete buildings in history or since have come down because of a short duration fires in them, the way these three buildings came down. See the research of physicist Steven Jones, Ph.D. at Brgham Young University. Dr. Jones presents very strong evidence that these buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, not by aircraft crashing into them.
Those who criticize 9/11 "conspiracy theorists" need to spend the time and do their own research instead of mouthing the government's official story, which is filled with lies, falsehoods and misrepresentations and lacks the hard evidence to support it! 2006 should be a time and year when the real truth comes out that 9/11 was likely an inside job. More and more Americans are coming to this conclusion. And if this is indeed the case, we are talking about treason here. The Congressmen who go along with the official story are complicit and the media who support the official story are complicit in the Big Lie!